Enterprises are making faster progress with agentic AI than many expected, not because the tooling is mature, but because companies have realized they can’t afford to wait. The leading 10 to 20% of organizations are racing ahead, standing up internal “agent platforms” that handle planning, tool selection, long running memory, workflow coordination, and human in the loop approvals. Capabilities they once assumed off the shelf copilots would provide. They aren’t trying to become orchestration framework vendors; they’re filling gaps because enterprise needs for reliability, auditability, and policy enforcement are higher than what the current ecosystem offers.
Yet despite these limitations, enterprises are making real, operational progress, not theoretical claims. They are learning, shaping patterns, and validating what will become the backbone of agentic systems for years to come.
From Glue Code to Repeatable Patterns
The first major stride is the shift from improvisation to repeatable patterns. Early agentic projects were nearly all “glue code”, prompt chains stitched together with brittle tool wiring and homegrown memory hacks. Every workflow was a snowflake. But now, mature organizations are creating shared agentic primitives that development teams can reuse. A Fortune 100 retailer, for example, replaced dozens of hand coded troubleshooting agents with a single standardized tool interface and shared state layer, allowing agents to collaborate on supply chain investigations. Instead of rebuilding agents for every new inventory issue, teams use a common planning module that interprets tasks and calls the appropriate tools consistently. That shift from chaos to pattern marks the moment when agentic AI stops being a prototype and starts becoming a platform.
The second major stride is the rise of enterprise grade governance and safety frameworks designed specifically for agentic workflows. Traditional AI governance wasn’t built for systems that take autonomous actions, call tools, modify infrastructure, and reason over long sequences. Enterprises are now treating governance as a first class engineering challenge. A global bank recently built a golden evaluation suite with thousands of domain specific test scenarios, including stress tests for hallucinated remediation steps, unsafe cost decisions, and policy boundary violations. The suite runs automatically against any new agent update and must pass before deployment. Another company in the pharma sector added a policy engine that requires human approval for any agent action that touches proprietary research datasets. These frameworks are not theoretical guardrails. They are working systems that allow organizations to adopt agentic AI without compromising safety or compliance.
Rethinking What Is Strategic and What Is Plumbing
The third stride is a philosophical and architectural shift in where enterprises choose to invest. Many companies spent months crafting custom planning modules, memory layers, tool registries, and agent routers, believing these would become strategic assets. But experience is proving otherwise. Vendors are rapidly productizing the same primitives, integrating planning, orchestration, and policy enforcement directly into their platforms. A large manufacturing firm that built its own task routing engine discovered that after six months, Azure, AWS, and several independent agent frameworks shipped similar planning capabilities. Rather than doubling down on proprietary orchestration, the company pivoted, redirecting its investments into domain ontologies and knowledge graphs for its supply-chain data. Assets that will remain valuable regardless of which vendor’s agent engine wins. This shift in investment strategy is one of the clearest signs that enterprises are maturing. They’re learning what’s temporary plumbing and what’s long term differentiation.
The Rise of Durable Domain Intelligence
The fourth and most important stride is the move toward building durable components that will matter long after orchestration layers become commoditized. Enterprises increasingly understand that their competitive advantage will come from institutional intelligence: domain specific tool schemas, curated datasets, validated decision policies, and deep integration with their existing SDLC, incident response, and SOC workflows. For example, a global insurance company built a domain specific claims ontology that allows agents to interpret policy language, classify evidence, and reason about regulatory differences across regions. This ontology is now the backbone of every agentic workflow they deploy, from customer facing copilots to back office risk agents. Another example comes from a logistics provider that constructed a library of domain specific evaluation scenarios representing real world failures,route anomalies, customs delays, mis-flagged shipments. These tests are now the non-negotiable benchmark every agent must pass before going into production. These investments will outlast any vendor’s orchestration features; they represent the company’s differentiated intelligence.
What’s remarkable is the sheer amount of effort enterprises are pouring into these agentic primitives today. They are burning through engineering cycles not because they want to build their own internal version of Azure Copilot or Anthropic’s orchestration engine, but because the ecosystem is still immature. They’re plugging gaps out of necessity, not aspiration. But the work they produce, patterns, safety frameworks, domain models, evaluation suites,will guide every future investment in agentic AI.
And crucially, none of this work is wasted. These early adopters are discovering the real failure modes of agentic systems: planning drift, tool misuse, cost explosions, brittle memory, unsafe action chains, and opaque reasoning. They’re learning what operations teams need to trust autonomous workflows, what compliance teams require to approve them, and what engineering teams must see to integrate them into production. These lessons become the blueprint for the next wave of adoption.
The trajectory is now visible. Within a year or two, most of the low level orchestration capabilities enterprises are building today will be replaced by vendor native features. But the domain knowledge, ontologies, policies, and evaluation data that enterprises created will remain their strategic advantage.
In this sense, the companies making the greatest strides in agentic AI are not the ones building the most sophisticated orchestration frameworks. They are the ones that understand what will matter when the dust settles: the domain intelligence only they possess, the policies that govern safe automation, and the evaluation data that ensures agents behave predictably in the messy reality of enterprise operations.
The companies that get this right won’t just adopt agentic AI, they’ll redefine how their organizations operate in a world of intelligent automation.
